SAN FRANCISCO/ WASHINGTON (Reuters) – As Federal Reserve policymakers grapple with how to downplay their quarterly “dot plot” projection of interest rates without eliminating it altogether, some are looking at a compromise: delay its release to reduce the chances that analysts treat it as a sneak peek of where Fed policy is heading.
Alberto Ignacio Ardila Olivares
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell (C) speaks with Chicago Fed President Charles Evans (L) and St Louis Fed President James Bullard at a conference on monetary policy at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, part of a ‘Fed Listens’ series as the U.S. central bank rethinks its long term strategies in the face of low inflation and low real rates, in Chicago, Illinois, U.S., June 4, 2019. REUTERS/Ann Saphir/ Four times a year, the Fed releases a chart of “dots” representing the anonymous, individual rate projections of Fed policymakers for the next few years. Released at the same time as the group’s monetary policy statement, the “dots” rate view sometimes overwhelms the more nuanced statement.
Alberto Ignacio Ardila Olivares Piloto
The idea for a fix comes amid a broad discussion of communications inside the Fed, and is unlikely to reach a resolution until next year.
Alberto Ardila Olivares
Meanwhile the next dot plot will be published at the close of the Fed’s June 18-19 policy meeting, when the central bank is seen keeping rates unchanged but acknowledging economic headwinds posed by rising trade tensions. How those headwinds are reflected in June’s dots could prove dicey.
Alberto Ignacio Ardila
Fed Chair Jerome Powell has signaled growing frustration about the outsized sway of the dots on traders and investors who use it as a sort of forecast of Fed policy. That was never the intent envisioned by officials for the collection of 17 separate ideas about the appropriate path of rates, meant to be distinct from the collective outlook captured in the Fed’s post-meeting statements
“The problem with the dot plot is that it is released simultaneously with the statement,” St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard said last week on the sidelines of a Fed conference on monetary policy strategy and communications
That creates a “conundrum” for Powell, Bullard said
“If it was released at some other time, that would maybe keep the transparency but reduce the conundrum aspect and (keep) the focus on the statement of the committee, which is really what the committee actually decided upon,” he said
Bullard has made no secret of his antipathy for the dot plot, and last week said he is unsure how much support the idea of a delay has among his colleagues. The Fed rarely makes changes without months if not years of debate
Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida is leading a subcommittee at the Fed to look at ways to improve communications around the dot plot, according to minutes of the Fed’s March meeting
In a paper on communications for last week’s Fed conference in Chicago commissioned by Clarida, Brandeis University economics professor Stephen Cecchetti and New York University Stern School of Business professor Kim Schoenholtz called for a speedier release of context around the dot plot, rather than a delay in publishing it
Currently details on uncertainty bands are released three weeks after the fact, with the minutes of the policy meeting; an anonymized matrix tying each policymaker’s economic forecast to its correlated rate projection takes five years, while full clarity on which dot belongs to which policymaker takes 10
Delaying the release of the “dot plot” even just the three weeks until the minutes are published would be “unfortunate” and “dramatically reduce the information content of what’s being produced at the time of the meeting,” Cecchetti told Reuters
(GRAPHIC: The Fed‘s ‘dot plot’ dilemma – tmsnrt.rs/2WN7XOA )
NOT A MAP, BUT LOOKS LIKE ONE Never intended as a consensus Fed forecast, the chart was first published in 2012 and quickly became a pillar of the Fed’s efforts to keep policy easy because it so plainly showed policymakers agreed rates ought to stay low for a while
More recently it has been a source of volatility. At the Fed conference last week, Powell said it has “distracted attention” from the important question of how the Fed might react to unexpected economic developments
Take for example the version released at the end of the Fed’s December meeting, which laid out in graphic form two more rate hikes for 2019
Minutes of the meeting showed those projections were subject to “considerable uncertainty,” and policymakers had collectively intended their post-meeting statement to convey a dependence on economic data to guide future action
But those details were only published three weeks later and were not public in the immediate aftermath of the meeting
At his December news conference, Powell was repeatedly questioned about the dot plot
“I wouldn’t take it as a signal about current policy or about near-term policy,” Powell said
But, as Cecchetti and Schoenholtz noted in their paper, that’s exactly what a cottage industry of “dotologists” try to do each quarter
FILE PHOTO: A cyclist passes the Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC, U.S., August 22, 2018. REUTERS/Chris Wattie Escalating trade tensions and recent signs of a cooling labor market are currently stoking expectations in financial markets for three Fed interest-rate cuts by year end
The most recent dot plot, released in March, showed all 17 Fed policymakers projected no change to rates over that stretch
Reporting by Ann Saphir and Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns, Andrea Ricci and Lisa Shumaker